Raw
VS
Virgin
The Great debate! When it comes to hair extentions, the options can be overwhelming. Two popular choices are raw hair and virgin hair, but what's the difference between them? On this page we'll dive into the world of hair extensions and explore the pros and cons of each type, helping you to better understand the difference between both.
-
Let's Learn the Difference
-
Let's Learn the Difference
-
Let's Learn the Difference
Virgin Hair: The Budget-Friendly option
Virgin hair is a popular choice among those on a budget. It's made from multiple donor hairs blended together into one bundle, resulting in a silky texture. However, this hair has been chemically processed and steamed in a factory to achieve popular texture that we know today, such as bone straight, deep wave, water wave, Fiji curly, yaki straight, etc. While virgin hair may look great at first, it has some significant drawbacks.
One of the main issues with virgin hair is its short lifespan. After just one install, the hair can start to tangle, shed, and become unmanageable. You may notice that the ends of the hair become dry, develop static, and start to tangle after just one week of wear. This is because virgin hair can contain synthetic fibers, which can make it harder to curl and style with high heat.
Another problem with virgin hair is that it can be prone to dryness and brittleness. This is due to the chemical processing and steaming that the hair undergoes in the factory. As a result, virgin hair may require more maintenance and upkeep to keep it looking healthy and shiny.
-
What's the difference
-
What's the difference
-
What's the difference
Raw Hair: The Luxury Option
Raw hair, on the other hand, is hair that has never been chemically processed or steamed. Raw Hair is cut straight from the donor head, washed thoroughly, put into wefts, and sold to you in its rawest state. This means that it retains its natural texture and shine, making it a more luxurious and long-lasting option. Available in a range of brown and black shades, each bundle is distinct, representing the unique characteristics of its individual donor. Raw hair is silky smooth to the touch and has a natural shine that's hard to replicate with processed hair.
One of the biggest advantages of raw hair is its durability. With proper care, raw hair can last up to five years, making it a worthwhile investment for those who want a hassle-free hair experience. Unlike virgin hair, raw hair doesn't require constant maintenance and upkeep, and it's less prone to tangling and shedding.
Another benefit of raw hair is that it's free from synthetic fibers, making it easier to style and curl. Raw hair also has a more natural look and feel, which is perfect for those who want a hair extension that blends seamlessly with their own hair.
-
The Great Debate
-
The Great Debate
-
The Great Debate
In conclusion
One of the main differences between raw hair and virgin hair is the price. Virgin hair is generally cheaper, making it a more accessible option for those on a budget. However, as we've discussed, virgin hair has a shorter lifespan and requires more maintenance, which can end up costing more in the long run.
Raw hair, on the other hand, is more expensive, but it's a one-time investment that can last up to five years. When you consider the cost of constantly replacing virgin hair, raw hair starts to look like a more cost-effective option.
In conclusion, while virgin hair may seem like a budget-friendly option, it has some significant drawbacks. Its short lifespan, tendency to tangle and shed, and potential for dryness and brittleness make it a less desirable choice for those who want a hassle-free hair experience.
Raw hair, on the other hand, is a luxury option that offers a long-lasting, natural, and silky smooth hair experience. While it may be more expensive upfront, it's a worthwhile investment for those who want a hair extension that will last for years to come. Whether you're looking for a natural look, a low-maintenance option, or a hair extension that will last, raw hair is the clear winner in the raw hair vs virgin hair debate.
